The first flower is there. Not open yet, but it is purple. I am so thrilled. Yee Ha  A couple stumbleupon pictures then off to bed to read.

Cats2022

Hot_chick_with_nice_pussy

1 comment

I didn't name them. Peace & Love Georgia & Annie

Nite Nite

How do you travel to and from work—personal vehicle, bus, subway, train, pedal power? What does it cost you per week in gas or fares?
Submitted by Jan.

I walk. Takes about 10 seconds.

何か渋滞している風景を見せてください。

And I found this instead. I did find the cat and they are beautiful.  Hyde Park Concert. yep

This is no surprise given the promotions that Sen. Obama has been getting in the media: ‘Obama elicits more excitement than McCain’, according to USA Today.
   I want to be the voice of reason but 21 years in communications tell me that this is important. If your brand, personal or organizational, elicits excitement among its constituents, then you have a greater chance of mobilizing those people when you need them.
   Even when it comes to politics, to get messages across to voters, one has to resort to the tried and trusted techniques of branding and marketing.
   There are few in the present generations who will, as many bloggers do, investigate someone’s voting record or dig deeply into their histories. It would be nice to say that presidents are not elected based on how much excitement they can generate. Or that we should place greater emphasis on other qualities like honour and sincerity.
   While some might point to exceptions, such as the Tory victory in the UK of 1992, I beg to differ. That campaign was hard fought by the Conservatives and depended on party unity—which was sorely lacking in 1997 when Tony Blair was elected. The National victory in New Zealand of 1990 was a result of the cry for change and the belief that Labour was leaderless.
   And the cry for change is such a powerful message in politics, because politicians understand our nature: even the vaguest change is better than the strongest, best defined policies if a party has been in power for too long.
   Labour in the UK in 1997, National in New Zealand in 1990, Labour in New Zealand in 1999, Clinton in 1992—all these are examples of that message. And that, too, “excites”.
   Sen. McCain should not pursue an excitement route himself, but he should capitalize on mistakes that the Obama campaign is making with greater regularity. The New Yorker gaffe—where Sen. Obama felt the need to comment rather than appear presidential and above satire—was an opportunity missed. Meanwhile, I wonder if people appreciate the maverick, go-it-alone style of John McCain, which plays well in the Senate, but could be symptomatic of future Cabinet divisiveness under his administration.
   A winner is by no means clear, and a week remains a long time in politics. Months, as Sen. Clinton will attest as she went from dead cert to second-best, are an eternity.

So there's this skill called "coffin" on trapeze (which I add to the growing list of trapeze skills with creepy/unpleasant names: skin the cat, meat hook, crucifix... it's like they're trying to tell us something...).  It looks like this.  Only my head sometimes ends up lower than my feet-- for a wide variety of reasons, including that I keep practicing it on different trapezes with different dimensions.  The other day, I was doing coffin near the end of practice, and my brain and I had the following discussion:

Brain: Hm.  I think your head was lower than your feet that time.
Me: Not really a "coffin" when it's like that, is it?
Brain: What?
Me: Unless you buried it wrong.  Like, with an uneven hole.
Brain: Right...
Me: Or in a swamp.  I'm doing "swamp coffin" instead of regular "coffin."
Brain: But then the whole coffin would sink straight down. 
Me: Not necessarily.
Brain: Well, why would it be lopsided?
Me:  Maybe I was buried with ball bearings in the coffin and they, like, rolled to my head and sank that one side.
Brain:  "Ball bearing swamp coffin?"
Me: "Ball bearing swamp coffin."  New skill.
Brain: I think it's time to go get dinner.

Thanks to Soft Serve Girl for the heads-up on this personality test. You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one.

Dreamy Idealist (DI)

(Just visiting? Take the free personality test and determine your iPersonic type!)

Dreamy Idealists are very cautious and therefore often appear shy and reserved to others. They share their rich emotional life and their passionate convictions with very few people. But one would be very much mistaken to judge them to be cool and reserved. They have a pronounced inner system of values and clear, honourable principles for which they are willing to sacrifice a great deal. Joan of Arc or Sir Galahad would have been good examples of this personality type. Dreamy Idealists are always at great pains to improve the world. They can be very considerate towards others and do a lot to support them and stand up for them. They are interested in their fellow beings, attentive and generous towards them. Once their enthusiasm for an issue or person is aroused, they can become tireless fighters.

For Dreamy Idealists, practical things are not really so important. They only busy themselves with mundane everyday demands when absolutely necessary. They tend to live according to the motto “the genius controls the chaos” - which is normally the case so that they often have a very successful academic career. They are less interested in details; they prefer to look at something as a whole. This means that they still have a good overview even when things start to become hectic. However, as a result, it can occasionally happen that Dreamy Idealists overlook something important. As they are very peace-loving, they tend not to openly show their dissatisfaction or annoyance but to bottle it up. Assertiveness is not one of their strong points; they hate conflicts and competition. Dreamy Idealists prefer to motivate others with their amicable and enthusiastic nature. Whoever has them as superior will never have to complain about not being given enough praise.

As at work, Dreamy Idealists are helpful and loyal friends and partners, persons of integrity. Obligations are absolutely sacred to them. The feelings of others are important to them and they love making other people happy. They are satisfied with just a small circle of friends; their need for social contact is not very marked as they also need a lot of time to themselves. Superfluous small talk is not their thing. If one wishes to be friends with them or have a relationship with them, one would have to share their world of thought and be willing to participate in profound discussions. If you manage that you will be rewarded with an exceptionally intensive, rich partnership. Due to their high demands on themselves and others, this personality type tends however to sometimes overload the relationship with romantic and idealistic ideas to such an extent that the partner feels overtaxed or inferior. Dreamy Idealists do not fall in love head over heels but when they do fall in love they want this to be a great, eternal love.

ShareThis

Adjectives which describe your type

introverted, theoretical, emotional, spontaneous, idealistic, dreamy, effusive, pleasant, reserved, friendly, passionate, loyal, perfectionist, helpful, creative, composed, curious, obstinate, with integrity, willing to make sacrifices, romantic, cautious, shy, peace-loving, vulnerable, sensitive, communicative, imaginative

These subjects could interest youl

iterature, philosophy, psychology, music, art (museums), writing, drawing/painting, astrology, spiritual things, meditation, handicrafts, writing, voluntary work

Meet Dreamy Idealists like you!

You are not alone! There a lots of people with your personality type out there! They are just like you - and they share your interests. Go and meet them in our new iPersonic Community. It's free! Check it out!

Add the description as an application to your favourite social network

We have some great applications running at the leading social networks out there. The application that corresponds to your personality type will be added to your profile - including some nice features you'll really love! Click here to ad it to MySpace, Facebook or Bebo.

Get your personality button

Your button will look like the one on the left. It will link to the page you are currently reading in order to lead your visitors to the description of your personality. Just click on your favourite social network in the tool below to grab your widget.

Great news! Flight of the Conchords has received three Emmy nods for directing, writing, and original music and lyrics. It didn’t get an Emmy nomination for best comedy series, which I think is a sin.
   Not bad for a show conceived by a bunch of Kiwis, even if it did take American money and HBO to get it off the ground.
   And thank goodness it did—how else would it have become so widely received? I can’t see a TV3- or TVNZ-funded Conchords cracking the US market—it would, like Outrageous Fortune, have been remade at best.
   Good luck to Bret, Jemaine and the others associated with the show.

This is from late 2007 (I found it here on Vox today) but it may still be valid: